Re: twolame - legal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Nikos Roussos
<comzeradd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a
> legal reason for that?
>
> twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to
> be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion on
> Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on the official repos.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419597

Debian also has implementations of H264 in the official repos.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux