* Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> [2012-08-10 14:08]: > Hi, > > Is there a reason why the RHEL 6.3 and F17 java-1.7.0-openjdk packages > provide many items with a different name, i.e. starting with "java7" > and "java", respectively. > > RHEL 6.3 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.5-2.2.1.el6_3.x86_64.rpm: > > java7-1.7.0-devel = 1:1.7.0.5 > java7-devel = 1:1.7.0 > java7-devel-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.5 > java7-sdk = 1:1.7.0 > java7-sdk-1.7.0 = 1:1.7.0.5 > java7-sdk-1.7.0-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.5 > java7-sdk-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.5 > lib.so()(64bit) > lib.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) > libunpack.so()(64bit) > libunpack.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) > java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel = 1:1.7.0.5-2.2.1.el6_3 > java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel(x86-64) = 1:1.7.0.5-2.2.1.el6_3 > Hi, This is because in RHEL-6.3 Java 6 is still the default JVM. The different virtual provides ensure that Java 7 is not accidentally pulled in by yum to satisfy 'java' either during buildtime or during install time. Cheers, Deepak > F17 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.5-2.2.1.fc17.9.x86_64.rpm: > > java-1.7.0-devel = 1:1.7.0.5 > java-devel = 1:1.7.0 > java-devel-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.5 > java-sdk = 1:1.7.0 > java-sdk-1.7.0 = 1:1.7.0.5 > java-sdk-1.7.0-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.5 > java-sdk-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.5 > lib.so()(64bit) > lib.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) > libunpack.so()(64bit) > libunpack.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) > java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel = 1:1.7.0.5-2.2.1.fc17.9 > java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel(x86-64) = 1:1.7.0.5-2.2.1.fc17.9 > > -- > -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> > -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 > -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
