Re: Doesn’t LDD break no-content rule?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MC" == Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

MC> (sorry, once more, this time to the correct address)

And now a public reply....

MC> I thought that the rule is that Fedora packages shouldn't contain
MC> just a pure content.

That is incorrect, pretty obviously if you think about it.  I mean, how
is man-pages really any different?  Since you included the URL in your
original message I assume you were familiar with the section, but just
in case, do read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content
 
Specifically:

  If the content enhances the OS user experience, then the content is OK
  to be packaged in Fedora

There's a set of restrictions; I don't see how the content in the
package you reference violates any of them.  Documentation certainly
qualifies, whether it's packaged along with the software it documents or
separately.

 - J<
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux