Re: Bad F17 install experiences: CentOS 6.3 vs. F17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 17:04 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When trying to do a test install of F17 on server hardware (a dual
> AMD Opteron system from 2006 with 1 GB of memory), I noticed several
> issues, while CentOS 6.3 installs fine.  So I want to share my
> experiences, ask for your feedback, and then file bugs when needed.
> 
> There are 3 major issues, at first sight unrelated.  Everything is
> fully reproducable (also the succeeding CentOS 6.3 install).
> 
> (1)
> The system has 3 NIC's, 2x Broadcom BCM5704 and 1x Netgear GA630.
> I use a BCM5704 for network install.  This works fine on CentOS with
> ksdevice=link.  With F17 I see multiple dhcp being started, resulting
> in multiple timeouts (I even see a second dhcp being started for em2
> while just before the console says that em1 got a link), and only
> after quite some time (a *long* time) the kickstart file is found
> and the install continues.

A wild shot in the dark, but not
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F17_bugs#ksdevice-case-sensitive ?
I wrote that because we had one person who was using
'ksdevice=BOOTIF'...

> (2)
> The F17 installer can't start X and falls back to text mode, while
> the CentOS installer works fine in graphical mode.  The server has
> a simple onboard VGA controller.  This is what lspci says about the
> graphics controller:
> 
> VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Rage XL (rev 27)
> 
> In the X.log I see:
> 
>     [   182.375] Backtrace:
>     [   182.375] 0: Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x36) [0x464d46]
>     [   182.375] 1: Xorg (0x400000+0x69d99) [0x469d99]
>     [   182.375] 2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f315a2bf000+0xefe0) [0x7f315a2cdfe0]
>     [   182.375] 3: Xorg (UnloadSubModule+0xf) [0x475fbf]
>     [   182.375] 4: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/mach64_drv.so (0x7f3157146000+0x183c3) [0x7f315715e3c3]
>     [   182.375] 5: Xorg (InitOutput+0x8ba) [0x4843ca]
>     [   182.375] 6: Xorg (0x400000+0x23246) [0x423246]
>     [   182.375] 7: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f3158f46735]
>     [   182.375] 8: Xorg (0x400000+0x236bd) [0x4236bd]
>     [   182.375]
>     [   182.375] Segmentation fault at address (nil)
>     [   182.375]
>     Fatal server error:
>     [   182.375] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting

Looks like a fairly straightforward X driver crash, so leave that one to
airlied...you might want to file a bug for it with relevant info from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Xorg_problems .

> (3)
> 
> And finally there is a fatal error: it won't accept my kickstart file
> and gives "reboot" as only option.  The error is:
> 
>     Only RAID0 arrays can contain growable members
> 
> The line it refers to in the kickstart file is this one:
> 
>     raid pv.02   --level=1 --device=md2 raid.03 raid.13
> 
> The complete context is:
> 
>     zerombr
>     clearpart --all --initlabel
>     ignoredisk --drives=sdc,sdd
> 
>     part raid.01 --size=500   --ondisk=sda --asprimary
>     part raid.02 --size=50000 --ondisk=sda --asprimary
>     part raid.03 --size=100   --ondisk=sda --asprimary --grow
>     part raid.04 --size=100   --ondisk=sda --asprimary --grow
> 
>     part raid.11 --size=500   --ondisk=sdb --asprimary
>     part raid.12 --size=50000 --ondisk=sdb --asprimary
>     part raid.13 --size=100   --ondisk=sdb --asprimary --grow
>     part raid.14 --size=100   --ondisk=sdb --asprimary --grow
> 
>     raid /boot   --level=1 --device=md0 --fstype=ext4 raid.01 raid.11
>     raid pv.01   --level=1 --device=md1 raid.02 raid.12
>     raid pv.02   --level=1 --device=md2 raid.03 raid.13
>     raid pv.03   --level=1 --device=md3 raid.04 raid.14
> 
> After this I define the volume groups and logical volumes in the
> kickstart file.  The same configuration works fine for RHEL6.
> Did something change so that this is not valid anymore?

Poking the relevant line in anaconda source with git blame gets me:

commit 958c9ea170a3630124a32bc87bc68eeb6ed4cc7b
Author: David Lehman <dlehman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri May 6 10:17:31 2011 -0500

    Allow growable md member requests but only for RAID0.
    
    Related: rhbz#659700

Perhaps prior to that, the parameter was simply ignored, so in your
CentOS install those partitions aren't actually growable? I'm not sure,
though. dlehman can likely explain better.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux