Re: FC3 and printing from Mozilla

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shouldt fixing somthing like proper printer support in the main browser
be something flagged as important? If this also goes into RHEL, that
could be bad.

Not mentioning that a number of schools etc. does use fedora, and they
probably have more than one printer. It is indeed a little dull printing
a more or less confidential document to the wrong site due to it is not
possible to select where it is going to come out...

So really - mozillas print dialog is quite important, even if it might
not seem like it.

Kyrre 

lør, 25.09.2004 kl. 19.55 skrev Zack Cerza:
> On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 13:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 13:29 -0400, Zack Cerza wrote:
> > 
> > > > *goes to enter it into bugzilla, if its not allready there*
> > > I found your report and added it to the FC3 Desktop target bug [1] which
> > > is aliased 'YellowPad'. 
> > 
> > We decided the YellowPad bug is only for bugs that, to quote Havoc, "we
> > will be here until 3am fixing if it isn't done the day before the
> > deadline".  I don't think we can classify changing Mozilla's print
> > dialog as one of those, unless Chris is already very close to finishing
> > it.
> Oh. Re-assigned. I was under the impression it just the desktop target
> bug; I've been wrongly tacking tons of bugs onto YellowPad, I guess.
> D'oh.
> 
> > Bugs that are "would be nice but not critical" should go on FC3Target.
> In fact I wasn't even aware of 'FC3Target'. :(
> 
> Zack
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux