On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 19:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > So, unfortunately I didn't do my homework and I discovered (after > > getting this package reviewed, approved and committed), that they broke > > API in a recent minor release (newer than the one required by Review > > Board). > > > > Given that this package is currently unsuitable to serve the purpose for > > which it was added, I think I need to downgrade it to a known-good > > version. > > > > I'm curious whether (given that it was just built today and nothing yet > > relies on it), if there's any way I could avoid the epoch bump of a > > downgrade and instead have it untagged from Rawhide and an older version > > of the package built. > > > > I'll bump epoch if I have to (and if upstream doesn't come through with > > a workaround by tomorrow morning's Fedora branch), but if I can avoid > > it, I'd prefer to. > > If it hasn't been through a mash yet, you can untag it from f18 and it > should be fine. If not, Epoch bump. :( How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
