David Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 21:30 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > >> Thanks. But I am getting this error for xs package scratch build. >> >> DEBUG util.py:257: --> gc-devel-7.2c-3.fc18.x86_64 >> DEBUG util.py:257: --> readline-devel-6.2-5.fc18.x86_64 >> DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: boost-python3-1.48.0-16.fc18.x86_64 (build) >> DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: libpython3.2mu.so.1.0()(64bit) >> DEBUG util.py:257: You could try using --skip-broken to work around >> the problem >> >> I am not able to find boost-python3 subpackage from boost package build. > I think this is a consequence of the latest boost packages being done in > a side tag for: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18Boost150 > > Currently, the latest boost build in f18 seems to be: > boost-1.48.0-16.fc18 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=326854 > > whereas the latest boost build is in "f18-boost": > boost-1.50.0-1.fc18 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=344226 > > The commit for boost 1.50: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/boost.git/commit/?id=a2450339dffbaadf0e31879429cc026862ec2439 > seems to have dropped the python3 subpackage which confused me and my > scripts. Temporarily, as I wanted to get out mostly-working Boost 1.50 out. I'll look at re-enabling Python 3 this week, but I'm thinking that I'll actually build it only after the merge. I'd need to do so anyway, and presumably that would impact ABIs of boost-python3, so there's no value in having the build in a tag. > It's not clear to me that anything actually uses boost-python3 I put in Python 3 support at a user request, as it seems sensible to me to support both Python versions, and it was reasonably easy to put the support in. It is quite possible there are no direct users in Fedora itself. > In the meantime, it looks like my Python 3.3 rebuild has broken "boost" > installs in f18 buildroots until the boost-1.50 build lands in f18. > Sorry about that. Is there an ETA for when the boost stuff will be > merged? I'm thinking the end of this week. This gives about a week for fixes and rebuilds before Alpha. Anyone knows if there is a way to address maintainers of packages dependent on boost? That's about 100 packages that depend on runtime libraries, and then those that have Boost as BR. I guess I may need to crawl package database. Apparently, without direct pings, people won't rebuild the client packages. Thanks, PM -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
