Sorry for the top posting. Just my 1 cent , i follow only fedora. But the answer could be only: political in first place. But this is the same for every distro, and this is true, in particular, for every distro rpm based for some reason. Every major rpm distro have its buildsystem, its bugtracker, its deepsolver, its rpm macro, its standard and so on. Difficult that this will change in the near future, if ever. My very long experience tell me this. Best regards (aside) why don't use lauchpad instead ? Because it use bazar as dvcs ? Really ? But no. 2012/7/28, Damian Ivanov <damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hello all, > > Any chance Fedora moves from Koji to OBS? > Why should they? > > OBS has a web interface so one can easily fix packages even from an > internet cafe/work/windows pc. > Projects can be developed separately and packages can be easily > branched and submitted. > openSUSE is entirely build by OBS. > Third party are unstable packages maintainers, can develop them at one > place for different distributions. > e.g as we do with unity for Fedora > -PACKAGE_dir > *source.tar.gz > *dummy.patch > *%name-%distro.spec > *%name-%distro2.spec > *%name-.dsc > > What would stop Fedora from doing this switch? > > Regards, > Damian > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo mobile -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
