Re: the fate of firewire

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



seth vidal wrote on Monday 13 September 2004 18:09:
> > On the one hand, you can't have kernel depend on an
> > optional kernel-firewire package.  On the other hand,
> > people's systems might depend on it...
> >
> > AFAIK Yum can't handle situations like this right.
>
> you want to track the version of the kernel and update another package
> based on what the latest kernel version is.
>
> No, that's not something yum can do.

How about making kernel-firewire depend on the exact version of the kernel?  
Then make sure the updated kernel-firewire package is release before or 
simultaneously with the new kernel package.  In this case, if you do 'yum 
update kernel', won't yum see that that kernel-firewire needs to be upgraded 
also?  If yum can't do this, how hard would it be to add the logic?

I've not thought this through in any depth, so I won't be surprised, Set, if 
there's a good reason you can't easily do this. :)

David



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux