On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 06:34:06PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
Is this really worth more years of headache? Here are two proposals to deal with this.
I don't think there is strong enough motivation to rename the packages. If Fedora Extras wishes to maintain an "imap" package then they can do so without needing to rename libc-client, modulo bug #132928. So I've built a libc-client package without the "Conflicts: imap" to fix that bug.
I still maintain that "libc-client" is a horrible name for the package, but this is technically acceptable at least.
Warren Togami wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx