Kenneth Porter wrote: > > Any reason not to call it uwimap-libs? Why should it get premier naming as > implementor of IMAP? (I realize it's a reference implementation of the > protocol by the protocol's author, but we don't call BIND "dns".) My recollection is that "c-client" was named that to distinguish it from the *real* IMAP client reference implementation... which was written in Common Lisp. (Yep, IMAP is that old. (And as broken now as then.)) -- Jamie Zawinski jwz@xxxxxxx http://www.jwz.org/ jwz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.dnalounge.com/
