On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:58:04PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > >Proposed Option #1: Rename libc-client to imap-libs > Any reason not to call it uwimap-libs? Why should it get premier naming as > implementor of IMAP? (I realize it's a reference implementation of the > protocol by the protocol's author, but we don't call BIND "dns".) we call Apache "httpd". :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
