On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 22:22 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > look at duplicity. duplicity uses (presumably GNU) tar, which brings us full-circle :) There is a page where the duplicity people talk about tar's flaws and what a new archive format might look like: http://www.nongnu.org/duplicity/new_format.html But it's just a design, not an implementation. dar is an implementation, which makes it much more interesting :) But so far no one has commented on dar. I was hoping someone out there would at least say "yes, i use it, it rocks!" or "yes, i tried it, it sucks!"...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
