on our RHEL6 servers I'm still using nss_ldap for the hosts database:
we have a private network and I don't want to copy portions of
/etc/hosts around to our servers and putting them into DNS isn't really
an option for us. I couldn't find an easy way to look up the data in
ldap for that data so I just stuck with nss_ldap for all of the
databases we needed.
Brian
On 06/07/2012 05:20 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I would like to retire PADL's nss_ldap and pam_ldap from current Rawhide.
SSSD has been the default in Fedora for quite a few releases with
nss-pam-ldapd as another option for deployments that, for some reason,
do not want to migrate to the SSSD. nss_ldap also seems to be abandoned
upstream.
Are there still any users of nss_ldap? If so, what are the reasons
keeping you from using either nss-pam-ldapd or the SSSD?
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
