On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 21:49 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 24.05.12 09:28, Alexander Larsson (alexl@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > I'm at a loss to how to proceed with the MiniDebugInfo work. I have > > patches to rpmbuild that creates the compressed minidebuginfo putting > > them in the main binaries, and I have patches to gdb that reads the > > compressed debuginfo on demand. > > > > However, the whole thing is useless unless we agree that we want to > > enable this by default. It seems some people like the idea, whereas > > others disagree that its worth the increased binary size. It doesn't > > look like either side is gonna be able to convince the other side, so > > how do we get to a decision here? > > The right way is probably to write a feature page for F18 for it, and > then get it through Fedora 18 feature process. With FESCO accepting the > feature you should have all you need to get your work accepted by the > various stakeholders. I did write a feature page for it. Thats how these threads started. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
