On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:16:49 -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > On 6/2/2012 7:03 PM, Adrian Alves wrote: > > am not following what u mean? Please don't top-post, Adrian. Top-posting makes it much more difficult to understand what you refer to, especially since you've asked a question. > > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:00:29 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote: > >> done I built it, check this out: > >> > >> Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/supercat.spec > > > > Check this out: > > This means to read the following link because it describes a mistake > that your spec file makes: Exactly. After reading the following page, you should be able to find the "unowned directory" in your package. At least try to find it. And if you don't find it or if you think there is no unowned directory in your spec file, mention that and it could be discussed further. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories > > > > And the following page is _not_ just for reviewers: ;-) > > This means to read the following link because it is wise to follow the > packaging guidelines even before formally submitting a package for review: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines A sponsored packager should be capable of reviewing others' packages, for example to offer trading reviews. With the help of the ReviewGuidelines page -- and particularly, the first MUST item on that list -- you should find more mistakes in your supercat.spec file. It is good habit to not just wait for a reviewer to do all the work, but perform a "self-review" and declare whether a spec file is supposed to meet the guidelines or whether there is something questionable you would like to discuss with a reviewer. -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.7-1.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.09 0.28 0.29 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
