28.05.2012 16:45, Tomáš Smetana wrote:
Because there several security issues and I think more reliable let it doing to upstream author rather than guaranties all correct in Fedora. In case there one or two sequential bugs I'll try off course handle it separately without so expensive updates off course.On Sun, 27 May 2012 23:28:03 +0400 Pavel Alexeev <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi. Due to the security issues ([1] for example) and act as newcomer provenpackager I'll plan update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 too (I should had been done it early off course). It seams addressed in rawhide.Hello, may I ask why you prefer bumping the soname instead of just patching the vulnerabilities? The patch is actually ready. Replacing the library with an ABI incompatible version in the stable Fedora release sounds like an overkill in this case. Thanks and regards, Rebuild all dependencies is done now, update submitted for testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nip2-7.28.4-2.fc16,q-7.11-12.fc16,gdl-0.9.2-4.fc16,dx-4.4.4-21.fc16,dmapd-0.0.47-3.fc16,k3d-0.8.0.2-5.fc16,inkscape-0.48.1-10.fc16,zbar-0.10-9.fc16,xine-lib-1.1.20.1-2.fc16,xastir-2.0.0-4.fc16,techne-0.2.3-3.fc16,ruby-RMagick-2.13.1-6.fc16.4,rss-glx-0.9.1.p-10.fc16,psiconv-0.9.8-9.fc1 6,php-pec l-imagick-3.0.0-10.fc16,php-magickwand-1.0.9-2.fc16,pfstools-1.8.3-3.fc16,oxine-0.7.1-12.fc16,libdmtx-0.7.2-5.fc16,kxstitch-0.8.4.1-7.fc16,calibre-0.8.33-3.fc16,vips-7.28.2-2.fc16,imageinfo-0.05-14.fc16,drawtiming-0.7.1-5.fc16,converseen-0.4.9-2.fc16,autotrace-0.31.1-26.fc16.2,ale-0.9.0.3-6.fc16,ImageMagick-6.7.7.5-1.fc16 Testers are welcome. |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
