On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:46:38AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 05/29/2012 05:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >We actually have this on the QA wishlist and it was one of the projects > >we proposed for GSoC for QA, but it didn't quite make it. We may still > >wind up doing it through some other channel, though. See also > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2012#Fedora_Gooey_Karma andhttp://blog.tirfa.com/gooey-karma. > > It makes no sense to have a gui application ( or an application for > that matter ) without having written the relevant how to debug/how > to test pages for each component to accommodate it. > > Such an application will just fail without it and might cause more > harm then good and yeah I have already mention the root cause for > those pages not already existing on this thread. I could not disagree more. It is blind reliance on written test cases that might cause more harm than good. IOW, if a tester does not know how a package works, it would be better if he did not "test" it. D. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
