Adam Williamson wrote:
> KK's position is that this is not true. He is arguing that it's better
> to require people to disable Secure Boot and use this as an opportunity
> to explain the problems with it, than to come up with a compromise that
> allows us to install in Secure Boot-enabled mode but:
>
> a) compromises software freedom to some extent
> b) compromises some functionality, possibly without the user being aware
> of the fact
> c) implicitly gives the whole secure boot setup our endorsement
Right, thanks for trying to explain where I'm coming from.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
