On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:13:32 +0200 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But why are you making this decision in the first place? What "decision" ? They explained the issues and problem and came up with what they would recommend we do. No "decision" has been made. > This: > 1. is a technical decision which affects the entirety of Fedora, and > thus MUST go through a FESCo vote to be implemented, AND > 2. affects the core values of Fedora, and thus MUST go through a > Board vote to be implemented. > > It is not acceptable that the kernel and GRUB maintainers are trying > to sneak this in through the backdoor with no mandate whatsoever from > our governance structure. I honestly don't know what to say to you here... did you bother to actually read the post? There's no sneaking, no decision, this is just bringing the issue up for feedback. There will be a feature for FESCo, there will be voting, all that stuff. Perhaps someone will come up with a better solution by then. Attacking them for this as "sneak this in through the backdoor" is insulting. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
