Re: *countable infinities only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:21:36 +0200
Michael scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:55:35PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > > That's why we didn't simply ask vendors to ship our key.  That
> > > would be /less/ equitable to other distributions than the
> > > solution we're looking at right now.
> > 
> > Has any thought been given to setting up group between various Open
> > Source distributions (Linux, BSD) to be a Secure Boot signer (with
> > security-oriented rules about what gets signed, probably similar to
> > whatever Microsoft is using today) and then getting vendors to
> > include the master key along site Microsoft's?
> 
> The last attempt to do something similar I can think of would be
> cacert. Afaik, they are still being audited to be added to Firefox,
> and i think they would be happy to explain all the issues they faced
> on that road.

Well, I'm a bit skeptical there, since they can't even license their ca
stuff such that Fedora can actually distribute it. ;( 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux