On 05/31/2012 09:34 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:22 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
This is a monopolistic attack disguised as a security effort.
The argument that it's a security effort is bolstered in many vendors eyes
by the existence of attacks in the wild which Secure Boot would prevent.
SecureBoot should only be Default:ON for Microsoft OS's and any other OS's that want to deal with that
and should be Default:OFF for all others.
Pretty sure it doesn't work that way. It can be on or off for a
machine, not per-OS.
--
Help me fight child abuse: http://tinyurl.com/jlkcourage
- jlk
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
