On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/30/2012 02:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> Yes, for the Fedora side of things I think gluster 3.2 is the best >> strategy with a fedorapeople repo of 3.3 if it's considered worthwhile >> for those that wish to play. For gluster 3.3 I suggest a feature page >> for F-18 / rawhide. Is it feasible for the missing hekafs features to >> be merged into the 3.3 release train by October when F-18 is due to be >> released? > > > I was under the impression that glusterfs would be automatically carried > forward from f17 into f18, as it apparently was from f16 into f17. It will be carried forward but a major change of features and enhancements is worth doing a feature page to advertise the feature improvements (see the gnome feature page as an example[1] ), it's something for marketing to use and allows you to also detail things like the removal or merge of HekaFS. > F18 builds (of 3.2.6) are already available in koji. Until now I haven't > heard that a feature page is needed for 3.2.x (or 3.3.x) to be included in > f18. (But how to deprecate HekaFS on f18 once the glusterfs-3.3.0 build is > available.) See above for feature page details. For deprecate HekaFS you add the the appropriate obsoletes/provides as necessary to the gluster package and follow the process for removing/obsoleteing a package in the wiki. > The features that are in HekaFS (in f16 and f17) will get merged into > glusterfs-3.3.1+, as I indicated previously, but I won't promise how many of > them will be there when f18 ships. We certainly hope that all of them will > be, but we aren't making any promises. So that's something that can be documented in a feature page in the wiki and updated as things progress through both the gluster devel process and the fedora release process :) Peter [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome3.4 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
