Re: Evolving standards for unpacked sources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 09:33:06AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 05:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:57:46PM +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> >>On 29/05/12 18:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>>Has anyone written any tools for converting git repos into patches?
> >>>Currently I use 'git format-patch' and then I copy the patches.
> >>>
> >>>Should we have a naming convention for patches?  I proposed to use
> >>>the 000*-*.patch files directly from git format-patch without
> >>>renaming them.
> >>
> >>>How should we comment the spec files for packages maintained this way?
> >>
> >>For Fedora's "erlang" package, Peter Lemenkov and I have been doing
> >>something similar. This is probably not suitable for large scale
> >>emulation, but it more or less works for us.
> >>
> >>We both maintain a fork of upstream's Erlang/OTP git repository in our
> >>respective github accounts. The RPMs are built from upstream's release
> >>tarballs plus Fedora specific patch files. Whoever does the new Fedora
> >>package, creates a fedora specific branch (re)based on that release's
> >>git tag and commits the patches for the RPM to that branch (doing
> >>cherry-pick, rebase, or whatever).
> >>
> >>The otp-get-patches.sh script extracts the commits on that fedora
> >>specific branch as patch files, hooks those into the spec file and also
> >>changes the git index to account for old patch files removed and new
> >>ones added. Specific lines from the commit messages are copied into the
> >>spec files as comments, and as RPM %if... conditionals.
> >>
> >>See the source in erlang.spec and otp-get-patches.sh for details.
> >
> >Thanks, I will have a look.
> >
> >Here is the change (simplification, really) I made to ocaml.spec:
> >
> >http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ocaml.git;a=commitdiff;h=a07112286bf310652eb2d719e64bf4936a045bc1
> 
> Just glancing at what you've got - have you considered something like:
> 
> diff --git a/ocaml.spec b/ocaml.spec
> index bbf2669..2ab0ecc 100644
> --- a/ocaml.spec
> +++ b/ocaml.spec
> @@ -233,9 +233,13 @@ man pages and info files.
>  git init
>  git config user.email "noone@xxxxxxxxxxx"
>  git config user.name "no one"
> +git config sendemail.to "%{name}-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"

According to the docs, this would send email to the package owner if
'git send-email' was used.  But since git-send-email isn't being used,
doesn't it do nothing?

>  git add .
>  git commit -a -q -m "%{version} baseline"
>  git am %{patches}
> +git config --unset user.email
> +git config --unset user.name
> +echo "Use 'git config user.email \"foo@xxxxxxxxxxx\" to set an address for patc

I guess the last line was clipped.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux