On Tue, 29 May 2012 13:13:43 -0500 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > On 05/29/2012 05:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> We actually have this on the QA wishlist and it was one of the > >> projects we proposed for GSoC for QA, but it didn't quite make it. > >> We may still wind up doing it through some other channel, though. > >> See also > >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2012#Fedora_Gooey_Karma > >> andhttp://blog.tirfa.com/gooey-karma. > > > > It makes no sense to have a gui application ( or an application for > > that matter ) without having written the relevant how to debug/how > > to test pages for each component to accommodate it. > > Indeed. However, I'd argue *both* pieces, a karma app and good > test-cases, are needed, and one not need block on the other. I agree. I'll also note for non gui use 'fedora-easy-karma' works great. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
