On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 13:20 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:28:16AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > I'm at a loss to how to proceed with the MiniDebugInfo work. I have > > patches to rpmbuild that creates the compressed minidebuginfo putting > > them in the main binaries, and I have patches to gdb that reads the > > compressed debuginfo on demand. > > > > However, the whole thing is useless unless we agree that we want to > > enable this by default. It seems some people like the idea, whereas > > others disagree that its worth the increased binary size. It doesn't > > look like either side is gonna be able to convince the other side, so > > how do we get to a decision here? > > > > Just go do it. See who actually shows up to stop you. To actually get the debuginfo in the builds all I need is a minor patch to the find-debuginfo.sh script in rpm-build. However, since the effect of it is global it seems to me that its a wider decision than just the maintainer of rpm-build. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
