-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/24/2012 12:04 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:22:35PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: >> >> I just got caught in having two different "validate" commands in my >> path. >> >> The /usr/bin/validate version is from the dnssec-tools package. It has a >> man page and usage info and is a tool to diagnose dnssec lookups. > > I humbly suggest that the dnssec-tools package should consider changing the > name of that executable as well, perhaps dnssec-validate. There are many > tools that could claim the term 'validate' for an aspect of what they do. > What if 'rpm -V package' had instead been written as 'validate package' ? > Or 'gpg -v signaturefile' had been 'validate signaturefile' ? I know, > first come first served, but it feels presumptuous to lay claim to a > generic action such as this. > > Thanks, Matt > I agree, we should not use a generic name for this function. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk++DpAACgkQrlYvE4MpobNETACgliGzcbjhl9+k0RKayyYvIW71 xx8AnjE2HwJLiBIJ7ukzINnbQHbuQFKs =QVmh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
