On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:49:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:02:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Agreed. changelog and version field conflicts are 90% of my cherry-pick > > conflicts. > > I would be in favour of no longer maintaining a changelog in the spec file > > As long as it gets put into the final RPM in the build process somehow. `rpm > --changelog` is often very, very useful in the field. Absolutely! BTW SuSE has not had an RPM %changelog section for at least 4 years. However they have a system where a hand-written <package>.changes file is incorporated into the spec during the build, so their solution isn't directly applicable. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
