On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > Currently, I have marked google-croscore-fonts as a optional package > in comps-f18. Considering it has got more orthography support compared > to Liberation font can we install it default? > But, I would also say that we have active development for Liberation > font and if a bug comes for Liberation font we can fix it. The entries that exist in both Liberation fonts and Croscore are basically identical glyphs right ? Times New Roman metrics: Liberation Serif, Arimo Courier New metrics: Liberation Mono, Cousine Arial metrics: Liberation Sans, Tinos Arial Narrow metrics: Liberation Sans Narrow, <no-equivalent ?> So there isn't a "Tinos Narrow", right ? Is it, at least theoretically, possible for Red Hat to a) relicence the Liberation fonts under OFL and merge in the extra glyphs ? Or are we painted into a corner somehow on that by 3rd party contributions under LGPLv2 ? b) Just create a new font based on the Croscore fonts using the OFL and call it Liberation Fonts 2.0 If we're caught on Liberation Sans Narrow being donated through hdu from Sun/Oracle under the GPLv2, split it off as a standalone "Narrow" project remaining under the GPLv2 ? C. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
