Re: x32 abi support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28:29AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> 
> > [...]
> >So, overall, x32 is only really beneficial for embedded platforms rather
> >than general purpose ones. As Josh says, if there's sufficient interest
> >then it could potentially be implemented as a separate architecture and
> >spend some time in secondary, but I don't know that there'd be a huge
> >benefit to Fedora to spend much time on it.
> 
> x32 makes intel be faster Atom Z2460 [1]

I can't find any x86_64/ia32/x32 benchmarks in that article? Regardless, 
I'd agree that x32 is potentially useful on heavily resource-constrained 
interactive devices like phones. The quesiton is whether it's useful for 
any of the platforms that Fedora targets. Virtualisation is something I 
hadn't considered and it may be that there are benefits there, but I'd 
still appreciate some real figures before encouraging people to spend 
time on it.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux