2012/5/15 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 23:47 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: >> I know I got what I deserved by attempting to "fix" by hand the move >> from / to /usr, just did need to boot from the fedora16 dvd, mount lvm >> root and finish my "fix"; brain fart, and cyclic dep on moving /lib64 >> to /usr/lib64 and then a symlink, leaving it with all binaries failing >> due to missing /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. >> After that, while it is finishing updating to rawhide right now, I did >> go search for documentation, but still find that >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedora_17 >> is not much clear about it. Maybe should strongly advise installing >> busybox and/or have a step by step procedure. > > It, um, does have a step by step procedure. Do what it says there, and > it works. I upgraded five boxes. Yes, it was me trying to be too smart :-) >> Or even better, to somehow >> have it done automatically, by some statically linked program. > > This is already done if you use any supported upgrade method - > preupgrade or netinst / DVD upgrade. What I did was to install fedora-release-rawhide, disable all repositories in /etc/yum.repos.d and enable rawhide ones, and then attempt a few times yum distro-sync until I removed all unresolvable updates, most due to several review requests and/or requests for enhancement that I will rebuild... Not a criticism, just reporting my hacker instinct of only reading documentation when everything else fails :-) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net Paulo -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
