On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 13:48 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > I'm still a bit baffled that a 3.5 MB increase on a 700MB live image > is considered a complete showstopper. That's one git package, for example; > I would hope that creative dependency trimming can find that space. > (Or reorganization of boot images, for example.) There's a modest amount of low-hanging fruit if people really cared about image size. For example, here's a way to shrink the (uncompressed) live filesystem by 30M: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812975#c4 I do find the concern for difficult install scenarios to be noble, but I would tend to class that as a different problem from producing a useful live image that also happens to be installable. But clearly the objection here is about "doing more work" more than "changing the image size". - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
