On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:21 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Apart from the worrying test suite results on secondary archs, > actually it's the libstdc++ issue that's causing the most headache. > How much effort does it take to maintain a compatibility version of > libstdc++? It'd make clang much more useful if we're not caught > between upstream (that abandons released versions) and the Fedora GCC > team's fast update cycles. Apologies, I'm not familiar with this part of the eternal waking nightmare called C++. Can you give more details? - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
