On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 16:05 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 19:50 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > > Has anyone tried to preupgrade from F16 to F17? Are there any problems > > related to UsrMove (or anything else)? > > I made the jump via preupgrade and had quite a bit of trouble. A number > of packages didn't get upgraded while some of their dependencies did, > including several that had strict version deps which should have > prevented this. The problem with this kind of report is that preupgrade uses the live repositories, so any kind of package dependency-type issue you hit is more to do with good old packaging human error than it is with preupgrade, and is not necessarily likely to be encountered by anyone else, at least in precisely the same way, because the repos change all the time. You'd be about as likely to hit trouble with any 'live repo' upgrade in this case (yum or DVD/netinst with remote repos enabled). anaconda does something like --skip-broken - possibly more powerful - in the interest of making sure upgrades at least go through, so in some cases where yum would just refuse to run, anaconda will force an upgrade through and leave a somewhat-problematic dependency state until you fix things up. preupgrade uses the 'release' repo, it doesn't include updates-testing, so it's normal that after a preupgrade, if you enable updates-testing (which is default for pre-releases), you'll find a lot more updates available. > For those wondering "where are the BZs", there was too much wrong in my > system for me to be able to get a graphical environment to log into > Bugzilla until after the distro-sync, at which point I no longer had > access to the data I would need to file meaningful bug reports. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
