Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.04.2012 16:30, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> Nothing is being taken away, the default is being changed.  If you're
> using Fedora in production, I presume you're installing with
> Kickstart.  You can set up anything you like in Kickstart, including
> not using firewalld if you so desire.

thank you for your feedback
exactly this was my question

i liked to get sure that "iptables.service" is not planned to get
removed in future releases and my intention here was to explain
why it can not be replaced in many perfectly working environments
before future decisions are made to get not offended again why
i come up after things are done

installation and default does not matter for me, i usually install
my servers once and upgrade them, currently F16, installed with F8
________________

i repeat my original question to have the full context here

>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default
>> An explicit transition is planned after Fedora 18 with dropping support for the
>> static firewall with system-config-firewal/lokkit. A migration from the static
>> firewall model will be needed then.
>
> are there only the ui-interfaces meant or do someone
> consider drop "iptbales.service" at all? if so please
> re-consider this!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux