On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 13:57 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/23/2012 06:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:53 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: > >> libsmbclient has been now removed from samba4 package (see bug #814451), > >> but what you have installed is a leftover from the earlier packaging > >> error. Incrementing the epoch number in the samba 3 package would fix > >> the upgrade paths again, making sure everybody gets back the samba 3 > >> libsmbclient. > > > > As far as I know that package never reached the stable repository, can > > you confirm you use updates-testing ? > > If that's the case I do not think we are going to up the epoch. > > Yes, the samba4 updates was only in updates-testing. However, > updates-testing is turned on by default in F17 and because of that, > every F17 user still got the libsmbclient update. > > It's your call to make, but I wouldn't base the decision on whether it > was in stable updates or updates-testing. Both are currently enabled by > default in F17. There is a reasonable expectation that when using a Fedora Beta you may end up in a situation that requires manual effort to get out of. I agree with Simo that no epoch bump is needed here. I do maintain that we should stop leaving updates-testing enabled once we hit Beta. (Alpha is fine). This would also help with getting testing for the bits that will ultimately be the final release.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
