2012/4/18 Mark Wielaard <mjw@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 13:41 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24:18PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> > Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did >> > push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16... >> > >> +1, I think something is wrong with the reporting tool. I just got upgrade >> broken emails for all of my packages, and they all appear to be ok from what I >> can see. Looks like the reporting tool is pulling the wrong nvr's for packages >> in the f16 repo. >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: <buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I tried to reply/report the issue to the buildsys but that address > bounces. Could the script be fixed to use an address that works? > > Thanks, > > Mark I've received a mail about broken upgrade path of UpTools package too. UpTools has the same EVR to both F15 and F16 too. So was it a bug of check-upgrade-paths.py isn't it? How often is run that test? Today I've followed instructions from http://jlaska.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/ is that right? I've run: autoqa-optin UpTools F-15 Tell me if I'm wrong TIA -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel