On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 10:33 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > ... > If you had already updated F17 with the upstream 3.4.1 then > the automatic script would have ignored your package completely. Hey, I didn't have much time to do so. You script stepped in only two hours after release on Gnome's ftp. It's not so bad, but still early and unexpected for me. > There's no way for me to know the difference between "maintainer not > doing update because he's busy" and "maintainer wants to handle this > himself in his own time". Maybe he's just _currently_ busy, sleeping (consider different timezones) and so on? Anyway, I never asked to have those packages part of the auto-build list, and never was asked for acceptance. This is easily distinguishable, isn't it? > Now you've told me in a not-so-polite way > I'll just take off evolution from the auto-build list. evolution*, please. > > I've no idea what it means in reality. Say I'll not add my build ids > > into your google page, am I still responsible for filling update of my > > packages? > > Yes, if you want to be, although I think we should aim to have one > easy-to-qa update for micro-point updates of a single desktop > environment, rather than the huge number of updates we had before that > were *impossible* to QA [1]. Is there a reason evolution is so special > that it shouldn't be considered a core GNOME package that gets > released with everything else? I cannot answer this objectively now, I'm sorry. There is certainly nothing extra special about those packages, apart of your auto-build script not being able to build those packages correctly (which it cannot do in general anyway), but I currently have bad feelings about this process, so, well, let me think about it. Bye, Milan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
