Re: disruptive libffi upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

> Incidentally - keeping the generated autotools stuff in git makes
> tracking down what *really* changed extremely painful.  It looks
> like the ABI was bumped in ee6696fdf4768ba6dd037fb6dd99435afa13816e
> but that commit has thousands of lines of generated code changes
> too.  It'd be better to either:
> 
> 1) Do "regenerate autotools" as a separate commit
> 2) Keep a separate git repository with generated stuff
> 3) Don't commit the generated files, have consumers install
>    the autotools, and join the rest of the world

Please go with (3), keeping generated files in git is just dumb.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux