On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > I've had some reports recently that appeared to suggest that in F17, > GFS2 was no longer being supported by the kernel. Having investigated > this, it appears that the root cause is that the gfs2.ko module has been > moved to a package called kernel-modules-extra (although the kernel RPM > still contains the directory in which the gfs2 module sits, which is a > bit odd - why package an empty directory?) > > Now, I'm wondering whether I should add a dependency on > kernel-modules-extra in the gfs2-utils package? Why not just open a BZ requesting that gfs2 be moved back into the main kernel RPM. IMHO having gfs2 in a separate kernel RPM just creates unnecessary complexity/pain for users. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
