On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:40:14 +0200, drago01 wrote: > rpm packages do not magically fix security issues. A vulnerability in > a plugin can be exploited by an attacker regardless how the plugin got > installed. (rpm or not). This is still unrelated to the point whether Fedora is a Free distro or not (it is not due to Linux firmwares - this part is known). So why isn't Flash + acroread etc. also installed by default or be available in repositories? I still do not see the difference between Adobe software and Mozilla plugins. Or as a follow-up to Matej Cepl - do the U.S. laws apply to Mozilla and not to Adobe? Thanks, Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
