Re: Why fixes of broken dependencies are not automatically tagged into F17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 6.4.2012 18:57, Jared K. Smith napsal(a):
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Vít Ondruch<vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
I am wondering why fixes of broken dependencies are not automatically tagged
into F17 (of course after staging in Bodhi), when the situation couldn't be
worse by such fix. If F17 is supposed to stabilize during freeze, such fix
is definitely stabilizing IMO. Am I missing something?
If it's stabilizing, then propose it as a NTH fix, and the QA team
will help vote it up or down in the blocker review meetings.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process

--
Jared Smith

Actually the reason why I am asking is that there is a lot of broken dependencies, because of Ruby update. Some of them are already fixed, but not accepted due to freeze. Proposing all this fixes as NTH would be nightmare for me as well as for the blocker review meeting. I'd love to see this process simplified/automated.

Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux