Hi, 2012/4/5 Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@xxxxxxxxxx>: > At the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Beta by an additional > week[1]. Minutes follow below. > > Though the QA team was able to get through all validation testing, it was > found that preupgrade was not functioning at an acceptable level, thus > becoming an additional blocker which prevents us from shipping RC3, and > necessitating the creation of an RC4. > > As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be pushed > out by one week. Beta will now be looking at an expected release of > 2012-04-17, and F17 GA is now scheduled for 2012-05-22. This is the second > one-week slip of beta. > > Adjustments to the full F17 schedule have been completed and now reflect the > above Beta and GA dates, and high-level milestones have been updated as well > on the Schedule wiki page[3]. > > We will be meeting again next Wednesday for another Go/No-Go meeting > (2012-04-11.) All hail our QA pals and the anacondanistas for their > dedication (and many, many others as well). > > -Robyn > > [1] Minutes: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-04-05/gono-go_continuation_f17_beta_rc3_part_two_or_three.2012-04-05-15.00.html > > Logs: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-04-05/gono-go_continuation_f17_beta_rc3_part_two_or_three.2012-04-05-15.00.log.html > > [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers > > [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule > > > Minutes: > > ============================================================= > #fedora-meeting-1: Go/No Go Continuation, Round Two, RC3, F17 > ============================================================= > > > Meeting started by rbergeron at 15:00:38 UTC. The full logs are > available at > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2012-04-05/gono-go_continuation_f17_beta_rc3_part_two_or_three.2012-04-05-15.00.log.html > . > > > > Meeting summary > --------------- > * Who's up (rbergeron, 15:01:03) > > * Test Results (rbergeron, 15:11:31) > * LINK: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Install > (rbergeron, 15:11:37) > * LINK: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Base > (rbergeron, 15:12:11) > * LINK: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_17_Beta_RC3_Desktop > (rbergeron, 15:12:22) > * AGREED: we are okay with the level of test coverage as of now on RC3 > (rbergeron, 15:16:31) > > * Blockers (rbergeron, 15:16:41) If I remember correctly, those were some problems with preupgrade due to the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove feature. Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17 with preupgrade? > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741594 (adamw, 15:18:19) > * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741594#c14 > (Martix, 15:18:54) > * AGREED: 741594 does not hit any of the criteria and the cited > scenarios are not significant enough to worry about delaying the > beta (adamw, 15:29:18) > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810226 (adamw, 15:31:12) > * LINK: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/9198/ (adamw, > 15:40:55) > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810161 (adamw, 15:48:57) > * AGREED: 810161 is rejected as a blocker because the impact is minor > (it's essentially a cosmetic bug, desktop is still usable), also it > only hits one specific virt configuration so it can at least be > worked around. accepted as NTH and will be commonbugs'ed if we ship > with it (adamw, 16:13:56) > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810289 (adamw, 16:14:24) > * AGREED: #810289 is rejected as a blocker on the basis that we've > never actually checked for low space on upgrade (and hence have > implictly never considered it a blocking issue). anaconda will just > try to upgrade and explode. so this isn't in fact a regression > compared to earlier releases, and we don't have a specific > requirement for a low space check in criteria or anywhere else. > accepted as NTH (adamw, 16:31:38) > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810136 (adamw, 16:31:59) > * AGREED: 810136 turns out to be a dupe of 810005, moving discussion > (adamw, 19:45:37) > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810005 (adamw, 19:45:42) > * AGREED: 810005 is accepted as a blocker per criterion "The installer > must be able to successfully complete an upgrade installation from a > clean, fully updated default installation (from any official install > medium) of the previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade > or by booting to the installer manually. The upgraded system must > meet all release criteria". the known workaround has too many > limitations to be considered 'good enough' (adamw, 19:53:23) > > * Go or no-go? (rbergeron, 19:54:12) > * we have a blocker. (rbergeron, 19:54:27) > * qa votes no-go, as do various others from engineering, fesco, pm > (rbergeron, 19:55:18) > * AGREED: we are no-go on F17 Beta RC3 sadly (adamw, 19:58:27) > * ACTION: rbergeron to update schedule.... again (rbergeron, > 19:58:55) > * ACTION: rbergero to send slip mail (rbergeron, 20:00:19) > * ACTION: tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice > (rbergeron, 20:00:38) > * ACTION: qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz (rbergeron, > 20:03:09) > * ACTION: adamw to get a hole in one (rbergeron, 20:03:23) > * we will re-convene tomorrow or monday (adamw, 20:08:56) > > Meeting ended at 20:08:59 UTC. > > > > > Action Items > ------------ > * rbergeron to update schedule.... again > * rbergero to send slip mail > * tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice > * qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz > * adamw to get a hole in one > > > > > Action Items, by person > ----------------------- > * adamw > * adamw to get a hole in one > * rbergeron > * rbergeron to update schedule.... again > * tflink > * tflink to do blocker meeting mail following slip notice > * **UNASSIGNED** > * rbergero to send slip mail > * qa heroes of awesome to get some rest plz > > > > > People Present (lines said) > --------------------------- > * adamw (360) > EDITOR'S NOTE: Dude! It's like 360 degrees of adamw :) > * wwoods (99) > * rbergeron (91) > * tflink (56) > * bcl (54) > * nirik (49) > * Kevin_Kofler (37) > * ajax (32) > * Martix (19) > * rdieter_work (8) > * zodbot (6) > * cpuobsessed (5) > * pjones (5) > * ianweller (4) > * kalev (3) > * spot (3) > * satellit_laptop (1) > * pschindl_ (1) > > > > > Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 > > .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot > > > > _______________________________________________ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
