Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 12:01:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There is no path to sure success. That's not how this works.
> 
> On the flip side I don't believe it's unachievable, I hope I'm not wrong.

I'd be surprised if ARM doesn't end up as a primary architecture. I 
certainly think it's achievable.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux