Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/4/12 11:36 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
To be clear, it would be used but ownership still resides with whomever
>  purchased the hardware.
Really?  You can't donate hardware, you can only let Fedora borrow it?
If you sponsor catering at a con, do you need to get the food back at
some point too?  Sounds like a silly distinction.

Hardware is likely classified in tax code as an asset, where as food at a conference is not. Assets being bought by somebody else and "donated" to a commercial entity probably looks fishy.

It's tax law, it's not going to be logical.

--
Help me fight child abuse: http://tinyurl.com/jlkcourage

- jlk
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux