Re: help updating sheepdog in F17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:40:52 +0200, AL (Alec) wrote:

> >>    https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4877

> >> Also, voting +1 on your own updates is being frowned upon. Even more so,
> >> if the stable karma threshold is just 1. We assume the update submitter
> >> is happy with the submitted builds, so that it doesn't need an explicit
> >> vote.
> > Indeed, what is the rationale for bohdi even allowing people to +1 their
> > own updates. Seems like it should be blocked, surely ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Daniel
> OTOH, there has been a recent discussion on the overall rationale for 
> the karma thing. Allowing this little loophole might be wise, as long it 
> isn't misused IMHO. And there's nothing here indicating any misuse.

Well, we don't need any update acceptance criteria policy
( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy )
if it's so easy to circumvent the minimum karma threshold of 1.

* bodhi - 2012-03-30 02:58:42
This update has been pushed to testing 

* fabbione - 2012-03-30 07:19:31

* bodhi - 2012-03-30 07:19:33
This update has reached the stable karma threshold and will be pushed to the stable updates repository 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux