Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The rules are, it has to be rack mountable hardware
>
> Hmmm... how many Raspberry Pis can we fit in a rack?
>
> And at $35 each, spares would be cheaper than a warranty ;-)

I don't think those were ever targetted as the ARM builder hardware
that would go in PHX2.  Jon mentioned "enterprise class" ARM servers
numerous times.  I was assuming that meant rack mountable.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux