Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/4/3 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 04/03/2012 07:29 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>  I really don't care who pays for the hardware, just that we
>> have hardware that meets the requirements for being in the colo.
>> ongoing hardware costs will likely be from one of Fedora engineering,
>> Release engineering or Red Hat IT's budget.
>
>
> Just out of curiosity what's the procedure for the community to provide
> releng/infrastructure with hw if it's needed?
>
> Does there exist an paypal account or something similar to gather funds for
> needed hw?
>
> Long story put short what can we do and what cant we do in that regard?

I believe it depends, in the case of ARM I believe it's going to be a
combination of working with vendors and possibly some budget from with
in Red Hat (no idea of the department or where) based on discussions
had at FUDCon.

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux