Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29

> FESCo and affected groups should have the ability to review whether or not
> the SA has in-fact fulfilled the requirements for PA, as agreed to by all
> parties at the time of application.  If those requirements are deemed to
> have been met, promotion is automatic.

I think a lot of the above boils down to providing goals for the SA
team while leaving discretion in FESCO's hands.  And in that light, I
think once requirements are met, promotion should be approved, but
certainly not automatic.

> There could be a deadline on application acceptance: EG, 12 months from
> acceptance of application to fulfillment of criteria.  This protects against
> criteria becoming stale.

I like this idea, modulo the exact time value.  If you apply and are
approved for F18, and aren't ready until F25, I think all would agree
that reassessment is sorely needed.

-J

> --
> Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux