On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
* #834 F18 Feature: /tmp on tmpfs -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs (mitr, 17:40:06)
* AGREED: tmp-on-tmpfs is accepted (+5 -3) (mitr, 18:12:52)
The wiki page says:
By implementing this we, by default, generate less IO on disks. This
increases SSD lifetime, saves a bit of power and makes things a bit
faster.
What about the memory pressure? with on-disk /tmp, the buffer cache
prevents excessive writing if there's memory to spare, but the system
still works when memory is used up. What happens with tmpfs? I think it
will just grab and hold memory required for the /tmp filesystem, which
is likely to cause swapping, which will hammer the disks even more. The
lack of quota makes it potentially even worse.
Perhaps this should be a default only for systems with ample memory.
Could it be a startup-time setting that is flipped back to on-disk /tmp
if some sustained memory exhaustion is detected?
BTW, I thought that the buffer cache makes the speed argument mostly moot.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
